|
COLD REALITIES
Like "a pistol-shot in the middle of a concert",
politics are tackled head-on in this devastating parable
Review by Ángel Gurria-Quintana
SNOW
by Orhan Pamuk
translated by Maureen Freely
Faber 436 pages
An urgent question seethes at the heart of Orhan Pamuk's
latest novel: "Can the West endure any democracy achieved by enemies
who in no way resemble them?" Judging by the Turkish author's devastating
parable of political extremism, the answer is no.
Snow is Pamuk's seventh novel, and the fifth
to be translated into English. Its narrator is Orhan, familiar to readers
of Pamuk's The Black Book. Orhan tells the story of his friend
Ka, a poet returning to Turkey after 12 years of exile in Germany. For
reasons both professional and personal. Ka travels to the remote town
of Kars near Turkey's eastern border. He arrives on the eve of mayoral
elections, sent by an Istanbul newspaper to investigate an "epidemic"
of young women's suicides. Secretly. Ka is also hoping to find Ipek, a
woman he knew in his youth and whose beauty he has cherished ever since.
When heavy Snowfall cuts off
all routes to Kars, isolating the town for three days. Ka feels "as
if he were in a place that the whole world had forgotten". As he
goes about his journalistic business in this confined microcosm, he uncovers
a hotbed of intolerance and radical politics fuelled on all sides by fear.
He can draw no easy conclusions within a culture in
which women kill themselves in defence of their religion, but are slimmed
by their relatives for committing sinful suicide. Although Ka is at ease
among the town's secular elite, he discovers that his host's daughter
- Ipek's sister - is leading a group of girls demanding the right to wear
headscarves. Ipek's ex-husband, once a westernised poet who has since
embraced political Islam, is the candidate most likely to succeed in the
impending election.
Nor are Ka's beliefs as unshakeable as he thinks: a
declared atheist, he soon meets and sympathises with "the infamous
Islamist terrorist" Blue. And yet he worries like many others "that
the Westernised world he had known as a child in Istanbul was coming to
an end". The spectre of Iran's ayatollahs looms large over the secularists'
nightmare.
"What's more important, a decree from Ankara or
a decree from God?" asks a zealous Islamist. While Ka merely ponders
the question, other characters are prepared to act on what they assume
is the correct answer. Faced by the prospect of an Islamist victory at
the polls, a theatrical troupe devoted to the modernising mission of Atatürk,
founder of the Turkish Republic, takes advantage of Kars' isolation to
stage a deadly coup, brazenly exposing the limits of the democratic principle
that modernisers claim to embrace.
In the discord that follows Pamuk heeds all sides.
Atheists are chided for relying on the army. Islamists are reminded that
they can pray-to their heart's content only because "godless"
modernisers are running the country. A radical secularist expresses scorn
for moderates like Ka. expecting democracy and human rights while “buttering
up" Islamic fundamentalists. A self-proclaimed ''communist, modernising,
secular, democratic patriot" joins forces with Islamists and Nationalist
Kurds to protest against the coup, but is soon persuaded that "the
army is right to want to keep them out of politics. They're the dregs
of society, the most wretched, muddled, brainless people in the city."
Caught in the thick of events, Ka's only wish is to flee with Ipek.
Upon meeting the narrator after the tale's tragic denouement,
an acquaintance of Ka pleads: "If you write a book set in Kars and
put me in it, I'd like to tell your readers not to believe anything you
say about me... No one could understand us from so far away." This
is the type of playfully self-referential twist that has garnered Pamuk
well-deserved comparisons to Borges, Calvino and Kafka. One might add
Auster, Saramago and Sebald to the list.
As in The White Castle and My Name is Red. Pamuk elegantly
dissects the recurrent quandary in Turkish history - look westwards, or
inwards and backwards. If Snow is less subtle than its predecessors,
if it is often didactic and occasionally strident, it is only because
its subject matter is more immediate.
Never one to flinch from the weighty issues of Turkey's
past and present. Pamuk is here at, his most political yet.
And, as one of the book's epigraphs reminds us, "politics
in a literary work are a pistol-shot m the middle of a concert... We are
about to speak of very ugly matters."
|